Ever since the release of Disney’s The Lion King, historians and others alike have been trying to
figure out what exactly the representation of the elephant graveyard and its
hyenas really mean in relation to Pride Rock. Many have come to the conclusion
that Pride Rock is meant to symbolize “suburbia”, or where the white elite live
(the lions), whereas the elephant graveyard is the inner city, where the blacks
and Latino’s live (hyenas). Robert Gooding-Williams agreed with this idea in
his essay called, “ Disney in Africa and the Inner City: on Race and Space in The Lion King”. He argued that Disney
“marked the elephant graveyard as inner city” through the hyenas in their voices
and actions. Whoopi Goldberg and Cheech Marin are the voice actors for two of
the hyenas, giving them a “black English and Latino slang”, whereas the
majority of the characters living in Pride Rock are voiced by white actors. By
placing the black and Latino characters in a place where ‘the light doesn’t
touch’, this is signifying the divide between the two places, the dark and
dismal elephant graveyard versus the beauty of the Pride Lands. In the scene
where Scar is singing “Be Prepared”, Gooding-Williams states that as the hyenas
are goose-stepping before Scar, which symbolizes Hitler at Nuremburg overseeing
his troops, a connection to the inner city projects is made. “It depicts the
building in which the hyenas live in as a bleak-looking and overcrowded
hi-rise, the unambiguous image of a housing development in the projects.” Gooding-Williams goes on to describe Scar as
a “political revolutionary who thinks historically”, and as someone who wants
to “end the otherwise endless reproduction of a natural course of life”, aka,
the ‘circle of life’.
Arguing against the views of
Gooding-Williams is John Morton, who believes that The Lion King isn’t depicting a political battle of the classes,
but is strictly showing a familial battle. In his essay, “Simba’s Revolution:
Revisiting History and Class in The Lion
King”, Morton begins by actually agreeing with some of the points
Gooding-Williams made about the representation of class and how The Lion King’s Africa “is a natural
paradise articulated by a stable social order benevolently dominated by lions
and excluding a ‘ghetto’ containing an underclass of scavenging hyenas.” But,
that is the line where Morton stops and begins his true argument against the
ideas of Gooding-Williams, that the battle being fought is not based upon class
upheaval and does not make Scar a historical figure. Gooding-Williams implies
that those living outside of Pride Rock, namely the hyenas, are the social
outcasts who join with Scar in his “historical revolution” to usurp the
oppressing elite of Pride Rock (Mufasa). Morton disagrees with this, and states
that Gooding-Williams’ argument about those living outside of Pride Rock being
pitted against those who live in it crumbles when Timon and Pumbaa are
mentioned. They are two primary characters who Gooding-Williams failed to
mention that don’t live at Pride Rock, but who are perfectly content with their
lives and even pair up with those of the supposed “elite” class (Simba).
For
this story to be a true historical class rivalry, it would have to be a battle
of a lower-level food chain group trying to usurp those at the top of the food
chain, when really it is just against two characters who are both at the top of
the food chain. If Scar wasn’t depicted as a lion, and was maybe a hyena, and
wanted to raise the station of the hyenas, then yes, the conflict could be
defined as a historical revolution, but because he is in the same class as Simba
and Mufasa, and because he did not have any desire to raise the hyena’s status,
then it remains simply a familial battle. Personally, I agree with Morton
rather than Gooding-Williams because his argument was convincing enough to
disprove all of Gooding-Williams’ points, and because Scar’s motives were
purely to reign over his brother and nephew, not having in mind to raise the
status of the hyenas.
No comments:
Post a Comment